my vote goes to Join The Army............the suicidal armykfoll wrote:I would vote for Stairway to Heaven.NeuroNomicon wrote:The best way to elect a President is a lottery system. This way you can be assured that no one with an agenda to become president gets it.
Essentially, Blaze would go out and get his mail one day, and realise he is in the running to be President of the United States of America. How badass would that be!?
I would definitely vote Unforgiven for National Anthem.
remember to vote republican tomorrow
Moderators: Brian, Metalfreak, MS_39455, AtlantaMetal Staff
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: Fri October 21st, 2005, 8:52 am
- Location: Brookhaven
- Contact:
NeuroNomicon wrote:The best way to elect a President is a lottery system. This way you can be assured that no one with an agenda to become president gets it.
Essentially, Blaze would go out and get his mail one day, and realise he is in the running to be President of the United States of America. How badass would that be!?
I would definitely vote Unforgiven for National Anthem.
if i'm going to be president for getting my mail then i'm going to make a real metallica song our national anthem.
either
........and justice for all
or
seek and destroy
-
- Member
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Fri September 23rd, 2005, 4:08 pm
- Location: The Ant Hill
- Contact:
Rap, spoken word, metal, punk, surf rock...did I forget anything?BlazeTSU wrote:Strange wrote:Careful there boy, there rappin' in that thur song.BlazeTSU wrote:my vote goes to Join The Army............the suicidal army
Rappin' ain't appreciated 'round these parts.![]()
Howabout "USA for USA" by Carnivore!
suicidal tendencies can rap all they want to and still be badass!
S muthafuckin T!
Let the joyous celebrations of Hell begin!
-
- WREKage Staff
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Fri June 25th, 2004, 2:28 am
- Location: Immanion, Almagabra
- Contact:
EDIT: Well, shit, y'all defused the argument before I got to reading through the 3rd and 4th pages. Damnit. Ignore the following, then. 
+-----+
Also, anyone who thinks the entire region from the Straits of Hormuz to the Punjab and the southern boundary of Turkey isn't critical to our interests is an idiot, plain and simple.
How much oil is in Afghanistan?
How 'bout Iraq?
The answers may surprise you.....Afghanistan has no reserves. Iraq has some, as we know, but they are wayy down on the OPEC totem pole.

+-----+
Al-Queda operatives were working with members of Saddam's government -- though not with Saddam himself, since he's actually more of a sectarian guy -- for many years. This certainly poses a threat to the U.S.....actually, to the Western world, since Islamic jidahists don't just hate the U.S.; they hate the Western world and our mindview.NeuroNomicon wrote:Vince and HR seem to be the only people on the board who can form an abstract thought.
The PNAC Cowboys have hijacked American politics. You can regurgitate the same horseshit you get spoon fed off of cable news, but the majority of the arguments here, other than HR's and Vince's, seem to be of the emotionally-cahrged, rally-round Bill O'Reilley sort of mindless herdism.
Iraq posed no direct threat to the United States. The fucking story's over.
Also, anyone who thinks the entire region from the Straits of Hormuz to the Punjab and the southern boundary of Turkey isn't critical to our interests is an idiot, plain and simple.
Of course not. Their detonation was quite tiny -- much less than a kiloton. Clearly, they've a way to go yet. In case you hadn't noticed, Condi is kinda smart.Iran is "working on "the bomb"". But Condoleeza Rice gets on TV and says, "We're not considering he North Korean missle tests as a threat".
Hell yeah, someone brings Oil into it. This Always Happens.Oil Tycoon politicians, playing around in an oil-soaked region of the world.
How much oil is in Afghanistan?
How 'bout Iraq?
The answers may surprise you.....Afghanistan has no reserves. Iraq has some, as we know, but they are wayy down on the OPEC totem pole.
Last edited by WREKage-Paul on Sat November 11th, 2006, 3:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- WREKage Staff
- Posts: 1757
- Joined: Fri June 25th, 2004, 2:28 am
- Location: Immanion, Almagabra
- Contact:
NOW who's stereotyping?NeuroNomicon wrote:P.S. If you're afraid of what a bunch of dudes without cars, without computers, without running water, and who spend their time herding goats and worshipping Middle Eastern tribal "gods" can do to you, you're a monumental, tumbling, tumbling dickweed. Not to mention a total pussy.


You DO know how elaborate and expensive the 9/11 plot was, right?
You DO know that the Brits have now uncovered no less than thirty conspiracies for mass terror attacks in England (current news), and that about ten of these are well-funded and tied to Al-Queda?
Make no mistake. The Western World -- not the U.S. alone -- is the target. George W. Bush makes a useful punching bag for the rest of the world, but the problem didn't start with him, and it won't end with him, either.
EDIT: see above
-
- Member
- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon May 30th, 2005, 12:46 pm
- Location: Atlanta
- Contact:
I agree with Paul, I haven't really keep up with much on the forum here lately.
For the first time in four election cycles, Democrats are not attacking the Diebold Corp. the day after the election, accusing it of rigging its voting machines. I guess Diebold has finally been vindicated.
So the left won the House and also Nicaragua. They've had a good week. At least they don't have their finger on the atom bomb yet.
Democrats support surrender in Iraq, higher taxes and the impeachment of President Bush. They just won an election by pretending to be against all three.
Jon Tester, Bob Casey Jr., Heath Shuler, possibly Jim Webb  I've never seen so much raw testosterone in my life. The smell of sweaty jockstraps from the "new Democrats" is overwhelming.
Having predicted this paltry Democrat win, my next prediction is how long it will take all these new "gun totin' Democrats" to be fitted for leotards.
Now that they've won their elections and don't have to deal with the hicks anymore, Tester can cut lose the infernal buzz cut, Casey can start taking "Emily's List" money, and Webb can go back to writing more incestuously homoerotic fiction ... and just in time for Christmas!
But according to the media, this week's election results are a mandate for pulling out of Iraq (except in Connecticut where pro-war Joe Lieberman walloped anti-war "Ned the Red" Lamont).
In fact, if the Democrats' pathetic gains in a sixth-year election are a statement about the war in Iraq, Americans must love the war! As Roll Call put it back when Clinton was president: "Simply put, the party controlling the White House nearly always loses House seats in midterm elections"  especially in the sixth year.
In Franklin D. Roosevelt's sixth year in 1938, Democrats lost 71 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In Dwight Eisenhower's sixth year in 1958, Republicans lost 47 House seats, 13 in the Senate.
In John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson's sixth year, Democrats lost 47 seats in the House and three in the Senate.
In Richard Nixon/Gerald Ford's sixth year in office in 1974, Republicans lost 43 House seats and three Senate seats.
Even America's greatest president, Ronald Reagan, lost five House seats and eight Senate seats in his sixth year in office.
But in the middle of what the media tell us is a massively unpopular war, the Democrats picked up about 30 House seats and five to six Senate seats in a sixth-year election, with lots of seats still too close to call. Only for half-brights with absolutely no concept of yesterday is this a "tsunami"  as MSNBC calls it  rather than the death throes of a dying party.
During eight years of Clinton  the man Democrats tell us was the greatest campaigner ever, a political genius, a heartthrob, Elvis!  Republicans picked up a total of 49 House seats and nine Senate seats in two midterm elections. Also, when Clinton won the presidency in 1992, his party actually lost 10 seats in the House  only the second time in the 20th century that a party won the White House but lost seats in the House.
Meanwhile, the Democrats' epic victory this week, about which songs will be sung for generations, means that in two midterm elections Democrats were only able to pick up about 30 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate  and that's assuming they pick up every seat that is currently too close to call. (The Democrats' total gain is less than this week's gain because Bush won six House and two Senate seats in the first midterm election.)
So however you cut it, this midterm proves that the Iraq war is at least more popular than Bill Clinton was.
In a choice between Republicans' "Stay until we win" Iraq policy or the Democrats' "Stay, leave ... stay for a while then leave ... redeploy and then come back ... leave and stay ... cut and run ... win, lose or draw policy," I guess Americans prefer the Republican policy.
The Democrats say we need a "new direction" in Iraq. Yeah, it's called "reverse." Democrats keep talking about a new military strategy in Iraq. How exactly is cut-and-run a new strategy? The French have been doing it for years. The Democrats are calling their new plan for Iraq "Operation Somalia."
The Democrats certainly have their work cut out for them. They have only two years to release as many terrorists as possible and lock up as many Republicans as they can. Republicans better get that body armor for the troops the Democrats are always carping about  and fast. The troops are going to need it for their backs.
For the first time in four election cycles, Democrats are not attacking the Diebold Corp. the day after the election, accusing it of rigging its voting machines. I guess Diebold has finally been vindicated.
So the left won the House and also Nicaragua. They've had a good week. At least they don't have their finger on the atom bomb yet.
Democrats support surrender in Iraq, higher taxes and the impeachment of President Bush. They just won an election by pretending to be against all three.
Jon Tester, Bob Casey Jr., Heath Shuler, possibly Jim Webb  I've never seen so much raw testosterone in my life. The smell of sweaty jockstraps from the "new Democrats" is overwhelming.
Having predicted this paltry Democrat win, my next prediction is how long it will take all these new "gun totin' Democrats" to be fitted for leotards.
Now that they've won their elections and don't have to deal with the hicks anymore, Tester can cut lose the infernal buzz cut, Casey can start taking "Emily's List" money, and Webb can go back to writing more incestuously homoerotic fiction ... and just in time for Christmas!
But according to the media, this week's election results are a mandate for pulling out of Iraq (except in Connecticut where pro-war Joe Lieberman walloped anti-war "Ned the Red" Lamont).
In fact, if the Democrats' pathetic gains in a sixth-year election are a statement about the war in Iraq, Americans must love the war! As Roll Call put it back when Clinton was president: "Simply put, the party controlling the White House nearly always loses House seats in midterm elections"  especially in the sixth year.
In Franklin D. Roosevelt's sixth year in 1938, Democrats lost 71 seats in the House and six in the Senate.
In Dwight Eisenhower's sixth year in 1958, Republicans lost 47 House seats, 13 in the Senate.
In John F. Kennedy/Lyndon Johnson's sixth year, Democrats lost 47 seats in the House and three in the Senate.
In Richard Nixon/Gerald Ford's sixth year in office in 1974, Republicans lost 43 House seats and three Senate seats.
Even America's greatest president, Ronald Reagan, lost five House seats and eight Senate seats in his sixth year in office.
But in the middle of what the media tell us is a massively unpopular war, the Democrats picked up about 30 House seats and five to six Senate seats in a sixth-year election, with lots of seats still too close to call. Only for half-brights with absolutely no concept of yesterday is this a "tsunami"  as MSNBC calls it  rather than the death throes of a dying party.
During eight years of Clinton  the man Democrats tell us was the greatest campaigner ever, a political genius, a heartthrob, Elvis!  Republicans picked up a total of 49 House seats and nine Senate seats in two midterm elections. Also, when Clinton won the presidency in 1992, his party actually lost 10 seats in the House  only the second time in the 20th century that a party won the White House but lost seats in the House.
Meanwhile, the Democrats' epic victory this week, about which songs will be sung for generations, means that in two midterm elections Democrats were only able to pick up about 30 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate  and that's assuming they pick up every seat that is currently too close to call. (The Democrats' total gain is less than this week's gain because Bush won six House and two Senate seats in the first midterm election.)
So however you cut it, this midterm proves that the Iraq war is at least more popular than Bill Clinton was.
In a choice between Republicans' "Stay until we win" Iraq policy or the Democrats' "Stay, leave ... stay for a while then leave ... redeploy and then come back ... leave and stay ... cut and run ... win, lose or draw policy," I guess Americans prefer the Republican policy.
The Democrats say we need a "new direction" in Iraq. Yeah, it's called "reverse." Democrats keep talking about a new military strategy in Iraq. How exactly is cut-and-run a new strategy? The French have been doing it for years. The Democrats are calling their new plan for Iraq "Operation Somalia."
The Democrats certainly have their work cut out for them. They have only two years to release as many terrorists as possible and lock up as many Republicans as they can. Republicans better get that body armor for the troops the Democrats are always carping about  and fast. The troops are going to need it for their backs.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery."
-
- Member
- Posts: 971
- Joined: Fri October 21st, 2005, 8:52 am
- Location: Brookhaven
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests